Skip to content

Chat-only review

AI assistants default to agreement. Users need structured adversarial review without installing anything or maintaining project files. This is the primary onboarding path and the fastest proof of value.

A user pastes a plan or decision into chat, runs /redteam challenge (or another command), and receives a structured review they can act on before committing.

Decision-makers, strategists, and AI power users who want immediate challenge output with no .redteam/ setup.

  1. User has a plan, memo, or decision draft
  2. User invokes /redteam <command> with the target in the message
  3. Model loads skill/SKILL.md and the command reference flow
  4. Model returns structured output in chat

If challenge output is structured (assumptions, risks, verdict, follow-ups) without any install step, users will adopt RedTeam before anchoring a project directory.

The harness loads the skill and reference flow; the model produces adversarial review output aligned with the command template.

  • Given the RedTeam skill is available in the harness and the user has not run /redteam init

  • When the user runs /redteam challenge <plan>

  • Then the model produces structured review output (assumptions surfaced, risks ranked, verdict, follow-ups) without requiring CONTEXT.md

  • Given CONTEXT.md is missing

  • When the user runs any chat-only command

  • Then the review proceeds using only the pasted target and skill reference — it must not error or block

  • Red teaming here means applied critical thinking, not cybersecurity penetration testing
  • Commands route through /redteam <command>; shortcuts may be pinned with /redteam pin
  • User completes a review in one session without setup
  • Output includes actionable follow-ups (qualitative review of command transcripts and .redteam/reviews/ when saved manually)
  • Which commands are most used in pure chat vs project-anchored mode? — maintainers
Section titled “Related requirements, tests, architecture, and ADRs”